CPE | How to Stop Rubber-Stamping User Access Reviews within Regulated Applications - Seguridad Mania.com - España y América Latina

Earn 1.5 CPE Credits on this webinar Most User Access Reviews (UARs), especially in SOX-scope applications and other regulated environments like SAP, Oracle, and Workday, are performed to meet compliance requirements — not because they drive meaningful security outcomes. They’re repetitive, rubber-stamped, and void of risk context. This session will explore how to bring real value into the UAR process. Instead of treating it like a checkbox exercise, we’ll show how to align reviews with business risk, improve review accuracy, and give reviewers the context they need to make better decisions — all without overloading them. You’ll learn how to: - Improve the efficacy of UARs by focusing reviews on high-risk access - Close the gap between compliance and security with smarter, risk-informed decisions - Simplify the reviewer experience to reduce friction and avoid rubber-stamping If you’ve ever felt like your user access review process didn't lead to an improved security posture, this session will provide key lessons on meeting that objective.